Judge mulls evidence admissibility in Rudd murder case
18-Feb-17 – Statements a former Chicago condo lawyer, now accused of murder, made to police are in a state of suspense as a Circuit Court judge considers arguments that concluded on Friday.
Judge Marc Martin must decide if Rudd’s waiver of Miranda rights, when he spoke with investigators in 2013, was valid given that he did not know an arrest warrant had been issued. Rudd has said he would not have cooperated if he had known about the warrant. At a hearing in Rolling Meadows on January 5, Arlington Heights Police Sergeant Richard Sperando said they had an arrest warrant just in case Rudd did not come in for questioning voluntarily.
Martin, noticeably annoyed, says prosecutors should have told the judge who signed the arrest warrant that it was only going to be used if Rudd did not cooperate.
McCarthy tried to reassure Judge Martin about prosecutors and arrest warrants. “When we’re charging someone with a crime, that could destroy someone’s life, they take it seriously.” Martin says he will decide on the motion by March 13. Rudd was released from custody last September after posting a $4 million bond. He is staying in the Chicago area and is being treated for health issues including cancer. Previous story: Admissibility of key evidence questioned in murder case against former condo lawyer |